Yes, it is possible to match your outfit to your tattoos.![]()
Monthly Archives: May 2014
May 26, 2014
My FB status update a couple of weeks ago:
Black skinny jeans, black layered mesh Cynthia Ashby top, black socks, NEW lime green Converse All-Stars, brown/back/cobalt/turquoise/lime/pale green linen-paper/rayon Habu Shippo scarf I made, chartreuse Gudrun shawl with turquoise/olive/fuschia dots.
As you can probably tell from the capital letters, I’m very excited about my new shoes:
They’re the latest addition to what’s in danger of becoming another collection:

Left to right: custom orange/pink, light green with cat pattern, bright green with missing laces eaten by cat.
I know these have become a hipster wardrobe staple but I’m old enough to be a (very young) hipster’s grandmother and I still think of them as gym shoes. Back before someone invented “athletic shoes,” kids and professional athletes alike wore these soft, flat canvas things. None of that fancy ergonomic air cushioned impact-dispersing space-age fiber nonsense for us.
I’m not sure why I’m so attached to them. I mean, I know why Converse and not, say, Keds (mom sneakers), but I don’t know why I still wear them. They have no support, I detest shoes that tie (insert long story about the trauma of having to wear tie shoes until junior high because of an erroneous theory about flat feet), and with the wrong outfit it looks like I’ve got clown feet.
I’ve also never entirely understood why they’re ultra-fashionable some years and just ordinary in others. When I was in high school there was a trend (well, three guys I knew did this) for wearing the high-tops in that “natural white” that looks like unbleached muslin. There was some particular way they were supposed to be tied, or not tied, or not tied all the way up–I’ve forgotten the details. Anyway, I’ve always worn low-cuts, so whatever.
I’ve gone through Nike and Puma phases but with the exception of a time 25 years ago when I hurt my back putting up gutters and could barely stand, I’ve never been able to take myself seriously in athletic shoes if I’m not actually exercising (versus the utter solemnity with which I view myself when I’m wearing Chucks with cats all over them). Unless they’re beaten nearly to pieces, they just look so practical, like sports equipment or mechanics’ coveralls. Converse All-Stars, on the other hand, are only practical if you’re a pro basketball player from the ’60s.
I have friends who say they’re no good for walking very far or standing for a long time, others who say they haven’t been the same since Converse started outsourcing to China, and just yesterday another one said the problem was that the laces are too long now. For some reason, though, they fit my Platonic ideal of gym shoes. And I’m really excited that I can have them in lime green.![]()
May 16, 2014
Maybe it’s because I grew up in the ’50s and ’60s when girls were still required to wear skirts or dresses to school and you could be sent home if yours were too short. The end of the dress code when I was in 11th grade felt so seismic that even today, I chafe when I see kids going to public school in uniforms. How dare some institution tell them what to wear?
Of course, that kind of control didn’t end with permission to wear pants to high school. When I was about 21 I had a clerical job in an office that forbade “dungarees,” which I assumed meant blue jeans. So in between the mini skirts and dresses (it was the early ’70s), I wore corduroy Levi’s. One day my boss took me aside and told me that these also qualified as dungarees. He pointed out that “the other girls” managed to dress appropriately; I pointed out that they all had husbands or fathers to help them buy clothes. He won.
After that I followed the letter of the law but I just couldn’t get with the spirit. I’d wear exactly what I was supposed to but I’d also have on green nail polish or be carrying a purse I made from old jeans I’d embroidered in high school. I wasn’t deliberately thumbing my nose at the rules. I just couldn’t stand for them to dominate me completely.
As I got older, the dress codes were less openly articulated, which made them much harder to follow. In grad school there was an endless debate about whether we—especially we women—needed to wear professorial (i.e., dowdy and boring) clothes in order to be respected by students or taken seriously in job interviews. My wardrobe was full of black dresses and long skirts and I wore pants when I was apparently supposed to wear a skirt suit. I used dark red nail polish or maybe my eye makeup was too visible. My hair wouldn’t arrange itself properly—it was the wrong length or too many different colors. I had this notion that I should be able to dress as I liked, but while prominent feminist theorists wrote essays about why it was okay to love both ideas and fashion, people’s sense of how apprentice intellectuals should look didn’t really change.
In my early 30s I started to hate my entire appearance (I blame it on a series of bad haircuts) and on the worst days I’d just put on something black. When I realized that this always made me feel better, I decided to skip the self-loathing and for nearly 20 years I dressed almost entirely in black, from underwear to outwear. If I’d been in New York, I would have fit right in. In the Midwestern college towns where I lived, not so much.
In the years before online shopping, it took two or three years for, say, the style of heels you’d see in Paris to trickle down to Madison, Wisconsin and if I went to a bigger city for a vacation or a conference I’d inevitably come back with some item of clothing or a pair of shoes that couldn’t be found at home. Yet this never made me feel like a trendsetter. Instead, I always seemed to be over- or under- or just improperly dressed.
It’s not like people would see me and exclaim, “What the hell are you wearing?!” In fact, I always got compliments, although they sometimes came with reminders about the various dress codes I was violating: “You’re so brave to wear that [inappropriate item of clothing] to that [event with your future riding on it].” As I’ve gotten older, there’ve been fewer of those little jabs but I still sometimes think them to myself. Is that too much cleavage for work? Should I be wearing jeans instead of this elaborate skirt? I usually end up sticking with what I chose. After all, it’s too late to relive my entire adult life in the ideal costumes. But I’m always a little bit torn.
I can’t explain how clothes and style and self-presentation became so important to me, how I came to believe so deeply that what I wear expresses something profound and essential about me, but there it is. I understand that my choices are entangled in the global chains of manufacturing and consumption, even when I buy my jewelry directly from the makers (always), my clothes right from the local designer (often) or even make my own (sometimes). And I know that what I experience as a set of unique, personal decisions can’t be divorced from the fashion industry or mass media or what I notice when I’m walking down the street. My special snowflakiness probably isn’t nearly as special as it seems to me, but I can’t stop thinking that when I get dressed in the morning, what I decide to put on matters. At least it matters to me.![]()
May 6, 2014
Chicago is famous for its temperamental weather, especially the wild swings with which winter ends and spring, at least theoretically, begins. When it’s 70 degrees in early April we all say, “Oh, just wait—it’ll be 30 again in a few days.” What with the polar vortex and all, this year has been worse than usual. I usually turn my heat off on April 15th but it’s May 6, for crying out loud, and it was in the 40′s when I got up this morning!
On top of making it nearly impossible to figure out when to plant tomatoes, all of this tumult is adding way too much drama to my daily decisions about what to wear. I keep putting on things that are bright and colorful in the hope that sympathetic magic will bring on spring, but that hasn’t really worked. So now I’m going to take the ultimate step: switching my cold- and warm-weather clothes.
Last summer, after years of cramming things into spaces that were much too small, I bought a house that has, if you can imagine it, even more storage than I need, including multiple closets in which one can actually hang clothes. In the room where I store the extras (along with a large part of my purse collection, knitting and sewing supplies, linens, and old cat toys) there are two dressers and a closet available for off-season stuff and whatever else doesn’t quite fit in the bedroom so I’ve been thinking about what moves and what stays put.
I always face two challenges during seasonal clothing changeouts. The first is the fact that my winter and summer wardrobes don’t really differ as much as many people’s do. I wear heavy linen, cotton, and sleeveless/cardigan layers all year so it’s mainly a matter of switching wool skirts and pants for really lightweight cotton or linen ones, putting away all the long-sleeved dresses, trading boots for sandals, and trying to remember where I put the shorts. Each year I have to decide exactly where to draw the line. What about the sleeveless dress that’s really more fall-winter because the fabric is so heavy, or the flowered capris that are heavy cotton but totally summer?
In the last place I lived, access to the off-season clothes required moving a full clothing rack, toolboxes, and miscellaneous baskets out of the way so I could get to the back of a long closet, which was such a pain in the ass that once I changed seasons, that stuff essentially disappeared until it was time to switch again. Now I only have to open a different closet, so the decisions about what counts as winter and what counts as summer don’t feel like such major commitments.
That leaves the even bigger challenge: what to do with things I haven’t worn recently. For lots of people—and according to every magazine and TV show that has ever given advice about clothes, shopping, storage, or hoarding—this semi-annual ritual is an opportunity to “prune” or “declutter” or “curate.” The standard rule is to toss everything you haven’t worn in a year. (Some people even say six months, but they obviously don’t live in an area that has four seasons.) The idea is that if you haven’t worn something, either you really don’t like it anymore or it’s outlived its usefulness and you’re too stubborn, nostalgic, tied to the past, or on-the-road-to-hoarder-hell to admit it.
But I can go two or three or even four years without wearing something that I totally love just because I haven’t had a reason to, or I forgot I owned it, or I got rid of the thing that went perfectly with it (which just demonstrates the danger of tossing out clothes without careful thought). One day I see a skirt or sweater or a fantastic pair of shoes that’s somehow fallen to the bottom of the pile and I think, “I can’t believe I haven’t worn that in so long! I’m putting it on tomorrow!”
Every time I have to make this choice, I ask myself whether, if I lost that weight or found the right shoes, I’d want to wear a particular piece again. That’s not as simple a question as it seems because it’s also about losing weight or buying shoes and then discovering that something I’d stopped being interested in wearing suddenly looks good again.
A couple of years ago I decided to use the fabric from a skirt I really never wore to make a new skirt from a pair of pants I liked but that didn’t fit anymore. I put on the pants so I could figure out how to do it and to my surprise, they fit again!
So yay, pants! And also boo, no new skirt! But maybe I just haven’t seen that old one with the right pair of shoes yet.![]()



